PageRank for Websites: Is There More to the Web?

Google's PageRank has been around for years, and infor. So in turn, a website uses words to connect with
the opinions of a lot of e-business owners, it canthat visitor. So how does that search engine know
make or break a site. Lately, with Google's fingers inwhich bunch of words are relevant, and which are
every pie, it seems important to remind everyonenot? By comparing them to all the other words on
that there is more to a website than just PageRank.the site. Keyword meta tags are still used to tell the
PageRank is a term that relates to the algorithm thatsearch engines in a glance what the site is about, but
Google uses to rank a website in its search engine.thanks to a bunch of unscrupulous web designers and
Coined by Larry Page, one of the engineers ofSEO's, meta tags are not as important as they used
Google, PageRank has come to mean so much toto be, because it is too easy to manipulate search
webmasters and SEO's that it dictates how weresults using keywords alone. Keyword meta tags in
market a website. But let me coin a few terms ofrelation to the actual words on a page determine
my own. (Or, borrow them from others, perhaps...)how important those keywords actually are in a
And while some of these concepts are included in thesearch, or "keyword density". Simply put, keyword
PageRank algorithm themselves, it's often helpful todensity is how dense those keywords are in the
be reminded that there are many factors that aactual content of a webpage. But it's not just about
webmaster should concentrate on, and not just oneindividual pages; it's about the scope of keyword
overwhelming aspect. It bothers me that Google'sdensity in general for an entire site. If a page has
toolbar's PageRank indicator "measures thenothing to do with what the website pertains to,
IMPORTANCE" of a page; important to them,then most likely, it won't get listed.LinkRankIf you've
perhaps, especially in light of the release of thedone any reading at all on search engine optimization,
Google Toolbar for Firefox on July 7th. But lack ofthen chances are you've come across link popularity
PageRank doesn't mean that your site isn't important.and its importance in optimization. PageRank initially
So how do you let the search engines, Google inmeasured how important a website was by its back
particular, know that? This article is a collection of thelinks, or a search engine's perception of votes for a
phrases that indicate the behavior of search enginessite. But you can't do any kind of search on link
today.FreshRankCurrently there is patent applicationpopularity without coming across a dozen or so ads
in the US Trademark Office from Monika Henzinger,that tell you that you can just buy your back links. It
published on June 30, 2005, that certifies that sheseems to be pretty popular these days to purchase
has a way of determining a document's "freshness"your back links. This is not to be confused with hiring
which we will name FreshRank, coined such byan SEO. Using an SEO consultant to market all
Michael Martinez on Cre8asite Forums. The abstractaspects of a website is probably a far better long
says that one of the problems is that the "lastterm investment than to buy a bunch of links. We
modified since" attribute isn't always correct, andlive in a world where we've gotten used to getting
even if a webmaster has figured out they canwhat we want RIGHT NOW. Whatever happened to
change the date, it still doesn't fool Google. Whatpatience is a virtue? Anymore, patience is a nostalgic
Google looks for is actual modified content. As far asconcept, and is almost as antiquated as dime-store
how Google determines how old a document may besodas.There are changes in the works to help curb
is still somewhat of a secret. Monika is attempting tothe back links controversy, with seven new search
patent a more explicit form of freshness, since not allexclusions, by placing a hold delay on newer sites
search engines use the "last modified since" attributethat have launched with seemingly huge amounts of
anyways, and stating that search engines need aback links before the site has even had a chance to
more reliable way of determining overall updatedtake off. John Scott of Cre8asite Forums offered an
content. Well, I for one, happen to agree.But consideropinion based on a source who used to work with a
this: some websites don't need to be updated. Doescurrent Google employee:"The probation does not
this mean they aren't fresh? Not likely. Think for aapply to new sites. It applies to links. When the
moment about that government bill that was put intoalgorithm was deployed certain older links were
action 10 years ago. No new fresh content there.grandfathered in. After that, links will be (are being)
What about the scientific formula for penicillin? I don'tgiven partial credit, and be essentially on
think that changes much. And what about the'probation.'""It applies to links, not sites. And the age
historical account of the Trojan War? Pretty muchof the link is not the only factor. The IP range of the
stays the same. Most businesses adopt terms andlinks and other considerations are made, and the
conditions or a privacy policy that is designed to stayperson who I discussed this with said that Krishna
the same. So it'll be interesting to see how theBharat is at Google primarily to develop and
patent, if approved, will pan out in regards to thisimplement this new algorithm. It is supposed to
type of information. There is no mention in theradically change the way links are
patent application of "gauging whether the pageevaluated."Spammers have traditionally harvested
continues to be a currently relevant citation." Evenlinks in the way that my neighbor harvests soybeans:
Google mentions how fresh a website's content is asmore is more. But it's the relevant links that achieve
a problem in a recent patent application. So it will bethe well placed rankings. Spammers artificially inflate
interesting to see if the new FreshRank will truly help.search engine rankings through many links, most of
As my grandfather used to say, "Well, we will justwhich don't relate to the sites content whatsoever.
see what we'll see." Indeed.TrustRankThis is a termGone are the days of link farms; I tried to search for
trademarked by Google. Google has this to say aboutone the other day, and couldn't find a single one. Now
TrustRank: "Web spam pages use various techniquesit is the day of the "directories". When compiling links
to achieve higher-than-deserved rankings in a searchfor a client, we get a lot of requests for link
engine's results. While human experts can identifyexchanges. A site, for example, that relates to
spam, it is too expensive to manually evaluate a largesearch engine optimization should stick to links to
number of pages. Instead, we propose techniques toother sites that have to do with the Internet and
semi-automatically separate reputable, good pagessearch engines. So why on earth would they want to
from spam. We first select a small set of seed pagesexchange links with Bahamas Vacation Packages? It
to be evaluated by an expert. Once we manuallyseems that the way to get around the non-relevant
identify the reputable seed pages, we use the linklinks these days is to create a directory with many
structure of the web to discover other pages thatdifferent categories that relate to just about
are likely to be good. In this paper we discussanything. I can't stress enough that these things are
possible ways to implement the seed selection andgoing to be examined by the search engines before
the discovery of good pages. We present results oftoo long, and it is best to just not partake. It is very
experiments run on the World Wide Web indexed bydifficult to pass up a link exchange for a new
AltaVista and evaluate the performance of ourwebmaster, especially when they are striving so hard
techniques. Our results show that we can effectivelyto get those inbound links. But it just isn't worth
filter out spam from a significant fraction of the web,it.AgeRankI've known several a-company that has
based on a good seed set of less than 200 sites."Therushed out to register a domain name just in case
paper they are referring to is a 12 page abstractthey need it in five or so years. This might be a good
dealing with Google's TrustRank, found at Stanfordidea for now, but in five years, will it matter? No one
University's site. In essence, TrustRank is a way toknows. AgeRank is a fairly new idea that has
cut down on spam and filter out content that is notoccurred to webmasters as far as importance to
relevant to the searcher in order to bring themsearch engines. There are a lot of sites out there
results they really want. While there is no way tothat exist for the sole purpose of spamming. And
implement techniques to include Google's TrustRankwith Google's recent stance on spamming (just look
currently, what this means to you as a websiteat the infamous Traffic Power fiasco), search engines
owner is simple: don't spam the search engines! Spamare taking into account the longevity of a domain as
is defined as email related in Webster's, but the termwell as all the other factors. However, all of the
has come to mean any unwanted information orwebmasters out there with brand new sites can take
propaganda that may have been received throughheart: it is theorized that AgeRank only makes up
deceptive measures on the part of the sender. To aabout 1% of the PageRank algorithm. After all, it
search engine, spam is hyperlinked pages that areshould matter too much that a website that has
intent on misleading the search engine. So as long asbeen around for years should have more importance
you are genuinely trying to keep your nose clean,than a new site, especially if the new site has far
you should be okay, right? Generally, this is true, butmore relevance to what the searcher is looking for.
you should still be careful. The best policy is toGoogle's number one goal is to bring the visitor the
develop your website for your visitor, and not formost relevant search results.There is, however, a
the search engines; you'll do well everypatent application in the works that Barry Schwarz of
time.NicheRankThis is a term that I'm simply makingthe SEO Round Table calls this the "sandbox effect,"
up. If you contact the Small Business Administrationbecause it's a place where the new sites can where
for a packet for starting a business, you get a 26they can all play nicely away from the real sites until
page questionnaire about your niche product. Therethey've had a chance to prove themselves. In an
are many aspects to NicheRank. Ideally, offering aexplanation of why new sites rank well at first, then
product that no one has ever though of before isdrop into obscurity, Schwarz said, "the only pattern I
the best niche to be in. Not everyone can have thatsee from the threads is that these are new sites. I
brand new invention that everyone just has to have,see a wide range of back links reported, a wide
however. So offering product in a saturated marketrange of styles of on-page optimization. Only pattern
is still possible, but you still have to find your nicheis the site was launched after December." The patent
market. What is it about your product that iswill be just another weapon in the arsenal against
different from all the rest? Why should someone buyspammers. Those spammers ruin it for the rest of
from you instead of from one of your competitors?us, don't they? But it seems that it could work for
Whether it's about price, or freebies with purchase,new sites as well, contradicting the idea of a
unbeatable customer service, or selection, you aredamaging sandbox effect. Google cites two current
not just selling a product; you are selling yourproblems with the way search engines work:
company. And this is what makes up NicheRank. HowFreshRank and LinkRank. The sandbox effect will
effective will you be at penetrating a field, and thensimply delay PageRank for a site, so as to give
stealing some of that market share? I can'tPageRank validity again, and not just something any
remember what movie this was in, but the sayingold Joe with enough cash can simply purchase. So for
"You gotta have a gimmick" is still tried and true. Sothe small business owner, this can mean something
what's your gimmick? How does it apply to searchimportant. For the spammer, however, it could be
engines?In an article by Scottie Claiborne, she talksdevastating.ConclusionGoogle's PageRank isn't going
about the infomercials that you see on TV. One inanywhere-at least not yet. Perhaps during the
particular, the "Chocolate Dream", was nothing morePageRank blackout in late May, 2005 had some
than an age-old concept: the double boiler. But thiswebmasters celebrating that PageRank finally bit the
established product was given a new spin by thedust, though most of them worried it wasn't coming
makers of the "Chocolate Dream", which made itback, especially those that purchased theirs. But it
seem like something you just couldn't live without. Idid, of course. So while PageRank plays, in my
love watching those shows on HGTV that turn oldopinion, wreaks far too much havoc upon the mental
things into new things. They are still the same basicstresses of any webmaster or SEO, and has far too
widgets, but they get a makeover to turn them intomuch importance in the minds of some, it's probably
something different. I'm not a garage saler by nature,around for good, but bringing back the original
as I just don't have the time, but I like seeing whatpurpose of PageRank can only mean good things for
possibilities those old items have for becomingthose who are truly deserving.There is a rumor that
potentially new ones. What's your "Chocolatethere are going to be some major implementations
Dream"?Search engines are excited over new things,of these changes sometime this summer. Even
even if you have an "old thing" that seems new. Inthough this is a rumor, it is one that makes me cringe
fact, search engines penalize for duplicate content,a bit. Humans don't like change; we are creatures of
and may not rank those sites at all. So you have tohabit-me especially. But change I will, because that is
make your product different than the rest of themwhat the industry is all about. I believe some of the
out there, even if it IS the same thing. And that'schange will have to do with those concepts outlined
NicheRank.ContentRankYou've heard the old saying:in the many patent applications, and link changes will
Content is King. Too many times someone developsbe the first to start. I'd bet my firstborn on it.My goal
a website and concentrates on how pretty or flashyin writing this article today is to remind you of the
it has to be. As an SEO, updating content to keep aimportance of doing what you should do best:
website fresh has always been a priority. Now, moreconcentrating on your website, and what it has to
than ever, as the algorithms of search enginessay, and what it means to your visitors, instead of
change (almost daily, it seems) and thewhat it may mean to search engines. This isn't a
jump-on-the-bandwagon-follow-Google's-leadgame in which the competitor with the most money
patenting of every idea that pertains to searchwins. When you have that down, everything else will
engines (this month there are eight that I couldfall into place.Jennifer E. Sullivan is an Internet Business
count), webmasters have to concentrate on whatConsultant who specializes in search engine
their website has to say, and not just a bunch ofoptimization and web marketing. She holds a Bachelor
pretty pictures, JavaScript, and flash intros. But thenof Science in Business Administration and Marketing
again, I knew that already. In a way, the searchfrom Kansas University. She has written several web
engine patent craze is forcing webmasters to domarketing articles, including "Hiring An SEO Consultant:
what they should be doing already, and get them10 Reasons Why You Should", "Let's Not Forget
back to basics: words.When a visitor is using a searchAbout the Little Guy", and "Success for the Early
engine, they use words to find what they are lookingEntrepreneur".